PDA

View Full Version : Special Election - Any pet issues? Anyone care?


DeadLamb
10-21-2005, 11:53 PM
http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/

I think the idea of a special election for $$$$ for the BS issues being throw out is pretty dumb but I still feel I need to vote. More so after getting punished by all these BS ads for stuff!! It really gets my "NO!!" feeling working being I think we already have too many law etc..

Anyone have some huge pet issue they feel needs to pass or not pass?
glancing over the web page there.

73 = notification of parents before termination of minor's pregnancy..
Going to go with no. Not that I think parents should not be told but I don't like these slow chip away moves from pro lifers.

74 - Something for teachers about forcing them to work 5 years before they can get a permanent job. Eh fine with me. Cut down on crappy teachers.

75 union dues. This one is BS and a waste. You can opt out NOW for not having your dues spent on polical stuff. 75 would change it to having to opt "in" so more will say no being it by default

stupid to even a vote on this redundant bs sep due to my strong dislike of unions over all. :poke: I'll vote yes.. Mostly due to the punishment they have up on me running 4zillion ads telling me not to vote yes.. FU!!

77 is redistricting by a judge.. Meh. waste of money but sounds good but then $$$$$$ to do it.. torn.

78 and 79 are prescription drug initiatives.. I have NO idea WTF is going wth those so they all get the big NO!

80 more regulation for electric stuff? Again with the care?

GOD this election is a steaming pile of BS wasted money to even have.. That stuff really needed a $$$$$$$$ special election!?! sigh..

Silly
10-22-2005, 12:40 AM
Originally posted by DeadLamb
http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/
That stuff really needed a $$$$$$$$ special election!?! sigh..

Agreed++! I'm gonna vote no on all of it, just because I don't think the election should have happened in the first place :( Fucking arnold. All the politicians figure out he's a douche bag, so he's gonna try and win the popular vote again... except, err holy shit! everyone else has figured out he's a douche as well, so now he's fucked! (At least I hope)

honestplayer
10-22-2005, 03:55 AM
no on 73,74,75,76

yes on 79, 80

Ash
10-22-2005, 08:25 AM
Originally posted by honestplayer
no on 73,74,75,76

yes on 79, 80

thats how im leaning right now

atsui
10-23-2005, 12:26 PM
Originally posted by SILLY
Agreed++! I'm gonna vote no on all of it, just because I don't think the election should have happened in the first place :( Fucking arnold. All the politicians figure out he's a douche bag, so he's gonna try and win the popular vote again... except, err holy shit! everyone else has figured out he's a douche as well, so now he's fucked! (At least I hope)
QFMFT

BIGKahuna
10-23-2005, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by DeadLamb
http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/
75 union dues. This one is BS and a waste. You can opt out NOW for not having your dues spent on polical stuff. 75 would change it to having to opt "in" so more will say no being it by default


That would be cool if you could Opt out of union dues to politcal stuff now. When I lived in other states and was in Unions we had no choice where our dues went and half the times it went to stuff I hated. Whether or not it is default to opt in or out is really symanics as long as there is an option. Unions are a waste of space if you ask me anyways :)